A declined quote is not a verdict on your house
A broker survey finds most non-standard customers turned away by a comparison site or chatbot never reach a specialist who could help. Prestige Underwriting says a computer's no is not the market's final answer.
A declined quote on a comparison site reads like a verdict on the house. It is not one.
A computer saying no is not the same as the market saying no.
Prestige Underwriting surveyed 98 brokers working across the non-standard market this year, in findings reported by Insurance Business UK. Seventy-two per cent said they regularly meet customers who were told there was no cover available, usually by a comparison site or a chatbot, before they ever reached a broker. Eighty-one per cent of the same brokers do not think those platforms point a declined customer towards anyone who might actually help.
Alison Williams, Prestige’s managing director, put it plainly. “A decline does not mean a customer is uninsurable.” The things that trip an automated quote are ordinary: a non-standard construction, a period left unoccupied, a subsidence history, a flood risk flag. None of that makes a house unsellable, only harder to price on a template built for the average semi.
Here is the detail worth sitting with. The obstacle is not underwriting, it is wording and signposting, and the specialist broker who could actually help is rarely told the customer exists.
A locked door does not mean there is nothing behind it. It usually means you need a different key, held by someone the first person to knock never thought to ask.
BIBA and the ABI launched a voluntary signposting commitment in January, meant to hand declined customers on to somewhere that could help. Eighty-one per cent of the brokers closest to the problem say it still is not happening. A customer who hears no from a screen has not had their house judged. They have had one tool’s limits mistaken for the market’s answer, and nobody on the other side of that screen is paid to correct it.